The Shroud(s) of UFO Imbecility – UFO Conjectures

While my interest in the psychological aspects of those
claiming to encounter UFO entities and, particularly, those believing they’ve
been abduc- ted (kidnapped) by extrater- restrial beings, is palpable for me, that
whole concern has nothing to do with the reality of UFOs, their essence,
source, or purpose for showing up on this planet.
 
Those who gather to see or take photos of UFOs in nightly
soirees are merely enjoying the sociability of human compan- ionship. They really
shouldn’t expect to see or capture a UFO on their pathetic camera phones.
 
And those who’ve gathered a few chumps willing to expend
monies on technical gear in a pretense of gathering information, via that gear,
detailing what UFOs are is, sadly, idiotic.
 
Only a “grab” of a UFO – a capture or “downing” of one –
will tell us what the enigma is.
 
Some think a governmental military (us, the Russians,
Chinese, or Brits) has already nabbed a UFO or shot one down, and knows what they
are, where they come from, or what they are not.
 
Outsiders, like the Avi Loeb Galileo group or Michael
Cifone’s Limina gang, have set up a pretend approach to study the UFO
mystery, just as Jacques Vallee did with his Invisible College thing,
but all are dog-and-pony shows, with no chance at uncovering the many-year
mystery.
 
UFOs may be intrinsically ephemeral and nothing is able to
discern any meaning if that’s the case.
 
But if UFOs are material in essence, a hands-on inspection
will tell us all or most of what we need to know.
 
Again, I refer you to Charles Ive’s short, insightful
musical piece, The Unanswered Question, to get to what I’m
writing about here.
 
RR