Federal Ruling Says that AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted

The latest in the AI debate is a ruling delivered Friday by federal Judge Beryl Howell, which upholds a U.S. Copyright Office finding. The finding — and the federal ruling — both state that artwork created by AI can’t be copyrighted.

This comes as people like CEO of Imagination Engines Stephen Thaler fight for works created by AI to be protected under copyright law. Thaler filed a lawsuit after the U.S. Copyright Office refused his request for artwork created by his computer system to be copyrighted. Thaler believes that AI should be considered “an author where it otherwise meets authorship criteria.” This is despite the fact that AI learns by using other artists’ and writers’ work, uncredited.

Even with this federal ruling, though, works created by AI may still be protected under copyright laws. The U.S. Copyright Office said it would consider each copyright case involving AI individually. Mashable explained that this could be boiled down to whether a work was produced solely by AI or if a human being had a hand in it. If a person is involved, the work could possibly be protected by copyright laws.

Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.

Articles You May Like

Go Behind The Scenes Of The Upcoming New Season of ‘Stranger Things’
‘Michael’: Kino Films To Distribute Michael Jackson Biopic In Japan
Nala Sinephro Announces New Album ‘Endlessness’
Lionsgate Horror Movie ‘Mommy’s Home’ Unfreezes a Cryogenically Preserved Mother
Kate Hudson And Matthew McConaughey Are Open To A How To Lose A Guy In 10 Days Sequel, And I Have Some Fun Theories About What Could Happen